2022-10-23
於世界中探尋自我：政治（politics）而已？ 系列講座
於世界中探尋自我：政治（politics）而已？ 系列講座 ※報名方法詳見文內
Finding the Self in the World: Is it all Politics?
2021年，我們有幸邀請到王汎森院士成為第三屆羅家倫國際漢學講座主持人，並舉辦「如何成為『我』、如何成為「我們」─中國近世思潮及其政治意涵」系列講座，2022年邀請到羅家倫國際漢學講座第三屆客座講座教授包弼德 (Peter K. Bol)教授演講，延續並開展王汎森院士之講題。
包弼德 (Peter K. Bol)｜客座講座教授 美國哈佛大學東亞語言與文明學系教授
地點：羅家倫講堂(達賢圖書館七樓)
※演講一：11/29 (二) 14:00-16:00 演講
一種思想史方法論（十一至十七世紀）
Methodology for an Intellectual History, 11-17th Century
若同時研究使自我與世界產生聯繫之「學」、以及通過寫作賦予「學」意義的諸「學者」，這將產生怎樣的思想史？本次演講試圖將宋代至清代學術分解為五項各有其「專門史」的主要領域。歷代學者的著作以不同方式展示個體如何融入世界，從而為理解人性相通之處與構建社群提供了不同基礎。本係列演講將主要關注三大領域：為政 (government)、文化 (culture)、道德 (morality)。在第一場演講中，我們將對比討論王安石與黃宗羲、蘇軾與湯顯祖、朱熹與顧憲成的著作，並由此引出以上三大領域的特點與變遷。
What happens when we take the subject of intellectual history to be both “learning” 學as a way of connecting the self to the world and the “scholars” 學者who give substance to “learning” through their own writings? This lecture proposes that learning from the Song to the Qing was constituted by five major fields, each with its own “special history.” In diverse ways the works of scholars showed how the individuals were embedded in the world around them. They thus provided different foundations for understanding human commonality and community. Three fields of learning will be the subject of these lectures: government, culture, and morality. In this first lecture characteristics, and changes, within these fields will be introduced through a comparative discussion of texts by Wang Anshi 王安石and Huang Zongxi 黃宗羲, Su Shi 蘇軾and Tang Xianzu 湯顯祖, and Zhu Xi 朱熹and Gu Xiancheng 顧憲成.
【報名方式】
敬請點擊下列網址、填寫表單，即可完成報名：
https://reurl.cc/leE2YE
【講座直播連結】 ：https://youtu.be/mwvH4rAyxkg
※演講二：12/02(五) 14:00-16:00 演講
經世之學：無關政治（politics）？
Statecraft Learning : No Place for Politics?
政府活動（或「政事」）與「政治」息息相關，但「政治」並不等同於「為政」。本係列演講以「政治」指稱個人或群體之間由於對如何為政觀點不同而產生的衝突。經世之學的「政治」以關注「政事」為主。本次演講意在討論經世之學整理信息的方法，暫不討論諸學者所主張的為政之道。經世之學是否自有其「專門史」？經世學者所關注的問題是否根據時代有所轉變？經世之學整理政事信息的不同方式對我們有何啟發？我們將通過對比以下幾組學者探索答案：司馬光與馬端臨、真德秀與丘濬、張居正與呂坤、陳仁錫與陳子龍。
The activities of government 政事involve “politics” but government is not the same as “politics.” In these lectures “politics” refers to the contention between individuals and groups to define the values that should inform government. Statecraft learning was a particular approach to politics, one that gave priority to the activities of government. This lecture explores methods of organizing information about governing in statecraft learning, rather than investigating the philosophies of government of individual scholars. Does statecraft learning have its own special history? Do the questions that statecraft scholars answer change over time? What can the ways scholars organized information about the activities of government tell us? This lecture pairs scholars to explore this question: 司馬光 and 馬端臨, 真德秀 and 丘濬, 張居正 and 呂坤，陳仁錫 and 陳子龍.
【報名方式】
敬請點擊下列網址、填寫表單，即可完成報名：
https://reurl.cc/5p7QQM
【講座直播連結】 ：https://youtu.be/YsPrlUzBcBw
※演講三：12/06(二) 14:00-16:00 演講
政治而已？為政（governing）的道德與文化面向
Is it all Politics? Moral and Cultural Perspectives on Governing
關注政治並不代表必須活躍於為政領域。二程、朱熹與陸九淵、王陽明與湛若水、顧憲成與劉宗周都十分重視政治且曾入仕，但他們的影響主要在於道德方面。契嵩、大慧宗杲、祩宏、德清這樣的高僧也都非常關注政治。以文采著稱的文士們同樣如此，某些文士雖然也曾擔任政府職務。蘇軾與黃庭堅、楊萬里與嚴羽、李夢陽與王世貞、袁宏道與馮夢龍都是例證。本次演講將探討道德之學與文學在政治層面有何不同，也將思考道德與文學領域構建世界的方式與經世之學有何不同。
It was possible to care greatly about politics without aspiring to devote one’s career to government service. Figures such the Cheng brothers, Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyuan, Wang Yangming and Zhan Ruoshui, Gu Xiancheng and Liu Zongzhou cared about politics and served in government but their influence stemmed from their ideas about moral learning. Eminent monks such as Qisong 契嵩 and Dahui Zonggao大慧宗杲, and Zhuhong 袾宏 and Deqing 德清 were also concerned with politics. The same can be said of literati whose fame rested on their cultural and literary accomplishments although a few served as important officials as well. Examples include Su Shi 蘇軾 and Huang Tingjian 黃庭堅, Yang Wanli 楊萬里and Yan Yu嚴羽, Li Mengyang 李夢陽and Wang Shizhen 王世貞, and Yuan Hongdao 袁宏道and Feng Menglong 馮夢龍. This lecture asks how the political perspectives of moral learning and of cultural learning differed from each other, and how these two fields of learning, each in its own way, challenged the priorities statecraft scholars assumed to be key to ordering the world.
【報名方式】
敬請點擊下列網址、填寫表單，即可完成報名：
https://reurl.cc/5p7Qnq
【講座直播連結】 ：https://youtu.be/uF0e_CiFGRk
※工作坊：12/09 (五) 14:00-16:00
問題、盲點、方法
What has been Missed? What has been Lost? What has gone Wrong?
本次工作坊邀請參與者共同探討以下三個問題：第一，我們應如何研究本系列演講未涉及的兩個領域：天地之道 (physical sciences) 與生生之道 (life sciences)？第二，我所採用的方法是否遮蔽了某些問題？第三，演講中是否誤讀、誤解了某些文本？
The workshop is an invitation to discuss three problems. First, how should we treat the two fields of learning in heaven-and-earth studies missing from the lectures: the physical world and the biological world? Second, what is ignored by the methodological approach I have adopted? Third, what have the lectures misread and misunderstand?
【報名方式】
敬請點擊下列網址、填寫表單，即可完成報名：
https://reurl.cc/ERqyqa
.jpg)
